 | United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on the District of Columbia - 1976 - 1114 pages
...thrown around personal intimacy and bodily integrity was not meant to protect only married persons : "If the right of privacy means anything it is the right of the iwiiridital, married or single, to be free from unwarranted governmental intrusion * « *." Ei»enstadt... | |
 | United States. Congress. House. Select Committee on Narcotics Abuse and Control - 1977 - 700 pages
...be prohibited, a ban on distribution to unmarried persons would be equally impermissible. It is true that in Griswold the right of privacy in question...independent entity with a mind and heart of its own, hut an association of two individuals euch with a separate intellectual and emotional makeup. If the... | |
 | Edward S. Corwin, Harold William Chase, Craig R. Ducat - 1978 - 694 pages
...privacy inhered in a particular relationship. Speaking for the Court, Justice Brennan wrote: "It is true that in Griswold the right of privacy in question inhered in the marital relationship. Yet the married couple is not an independent entity with a mind and heart of its own, but an association of... | |
 | Paul Ramsey, Robert Paul Ramsey - 1978 - 380 pages
...intrusion, the state has an interest. Surely it was not necessary for the Court to say, in that case, that "if the right of privacy means anything, it is the right of the individual ... to be free from unwarranted government instrusion into matters so fundamentally affecting a person... | |
 | Richard A. Posner - 1983 - 436 pages
...clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. The heart of the opinion is the following passage:53 It is true that in Griswold the right of privacy in question inhered in the marital relationship. Yet the married couple is not an independent entity with a mind and heart of its own, but an association of... | |
| |