Constitutional Debate in Action: Governmental powers
Rowman & Littlefield, 2004 - 319 pages
Taking into account the political and intellectual forces that shape Supreme Court decisions, Constitutional Debate in Action examines how and why the U.S. Constitution continues to grow and adapt to human wants, passions, and values. Not your traditional constitutional-law textbook, this three-volume set views the Constitution as an institutionalized form of debate by which people press their political demands and arguments upon the Supreme Court. This process-oriented approach goes beyond a straightforward examination of how the decisions of Supreme Court justices have transformed constitutional doctrine through the ages; it explores the actual process of adjudication itself. Each case study covers the legal and political background; including relevant out-of-court discussions, to help students understand the political framework in which the Supreme Court operates. Actual legal briefs filed in landmark cases, and corresponding oral arguments before the Supreme Court, provide students with a front-row seat to the process of constitutional argumentation. As they evaluate the opposing viewpoints, students are better equipped to evaluate critically final Supreme Court decisions and opinions. In addition, students gain a valuable perspective on the role of the Supreme Court in our constitutional democracy. Each volume examines in-depth key landmark decisions. Governmental Powers covers: The Power of Judicial Review: Marbury v. Madison, The Commerce Power: NLRB v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp, The War Power: Korematsu v. United States, Presidential Emergency Powers: Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Sawyer, and Executive Privilege: United States v. Nixon.
Avis des internautes - Rédiger un commentaire
Aucun commentaire n'a été trouvé aux emplacements habituels.
Table des matières
Autres éditions - Tout afficher
Expressions et termes fréquents
according action activities American appointed argued argument Attorney authority branch brief Chief citizens claim clause Commander commission companies concerning Congress congressional consider Constitution course criminal danger deal decide decision defense Department determine direct doctrine duty effect emergency employees evacuation evidence exclusion executive executive privilege exercise existence fact federal federal government force give granted House important individual industry interpretation interstate commerce involved issue Japanese judges judicial judicial review Judiciary jurisdiction Justice labor legislative liberty limits Marbury Marshall materials matter means ment military necessary Nixon operations opinion particular persons political practical present President presidential Press principle production protect question reason refused regulate relations respect responsibility result rule seizure Senate separation situation Special statute steel strike Supreme Court tion United validity violation wages