...there is no occasion to prove that it was presented there for payment. PRICE v. MITCHELL. '"THIS was an action by the indorsee against the maker of a promissory note in the following form : . . London, July 16. 1814. " Six months after date I promise to pay to " Mr....

...compensate the defendant for the costs incurred in the action, by such non-payment, makes no difference. In an action by the indorsee against the maker of a promissory note1 without original consideration, if the payee has become bankrupt, and obtained his certificate...

...holder, without notice of the illegality •, unless he obtained the bill after it became due1. Thus in an action by the indorsee against the maker of a promissory note, the defence insisted on was, that the note had been given for hits against the defendant in a lottery...

...serjeant, for the plaintiffs. Best, serjeant, for the defendant. CB Richards v. Lord Mttsington. This was an action by the indorsee against the maker of a promissory note. The note was in the common form; but in the margin, and underneath the name of the maker, was written,...

...serjeant, for the plaintiffs. Best, serjeant, for the defendant. CB Richards f . Lord Milsington. This was an action by the indorsee against the maker of a promissory note. The note was in the common form ; but in the margin, and underneath the name of tlie maker, was written,...

...witness to prove the consideration for the indorsement. Shuttleworth v. Ste- • phens, 1 Camp. 408. But in an action by the indorsee against the maker of a promissory note without original consideration, if the maker has become bankrupt and obtained his certificate subsequently...

...which 1 recollect as at all applicable to the present, is that of "Nelson v. Whittall (a). That was an action by the indorsee against the maker of a promissory note, attested by a subscribing witness, who was dead; and there it was held that evidence of hit handwriting,...

...is not a negotiable note, on which the indorsee can sue in his own name. M'Cormick v. Trotter. 94 7. In an action by the indorsee against the maker of a promissory note, the handwriting of the indorser must be proved. Ib. BLANK. See ALTERATION. BOARD OF PROPERTY. 1. The...

...this was unnecessary, and that the plaintiff need not prove it. Tanner v. Bean, 7*. 6G.4. 312 3. Where in an action by the indorsee against the maker of a promissory note payable with interest on demand, the plaintiff having proved that he gave value for it, the defendant...

...has been since solemnly ruled by the Court of King's Bench : for in Barough v. White, (3) which was an action by the indorsee against the maker of a promissory note, (s) 2 Bing. 269 ; sc 3 Law Journ. CP 264. (3) 4 R. 4 C. 325 ; 3 Law Journ. KB 227. declarations made...