Jury Trials and Plea Bargaining: A True HistoryBloomsbury Publishing, 31 mars 2005 - 392 pages This book is a study of the social transformation of criminal justice, its institutions, its method of case disposition and the source of its legitimacy. Focused upon the apprehension, investigation and adjudication of indicted cases in New York City's main trial tribunal in the nineteenth century - the Court of General Sessions - it traces the historical underpinnings of a lawyering culture which, in the first half of the nineteenth century, celebrated trial by jury as the fairest and most reliable method of case disposition and then at the middle of the century dramatically gave birth to plea bargaining, which thereafter became the dominant method of case disposition in the United States. The book demonstrates that the nature of criminal prosecutions in everyday indicted cases was transformed, from disputes between private parties resolved through a public determination of the facts and law to a private determination of the issues between the state and the individual, marked by greater police involvement in the processing of defendants and public prosecutorial discretion. As this occurred, the structural purpose of criminal courts changed - from individual to aggregate justice - as did the method and manner of their dispositions - from trials to guilty pleas. Contemporaneously, a new criminology emerged, with its origins in European jurisprudence, which was to transform the way in which crime was viewed as a social and political problem. The book, therefore, sheds light on the relationship of the method of case disposition to the means of securing social control of an underclass, in the context of the legitimation of a new social order in which the local state sought to define groups of people as well as actual offending in criminogenic terms. "At a moment when France is poised to adopt plea bargaining, McConville and Mirsky offer the best historical account of its emergence in mid-nineteenth century America, based upon exhaustive analysis of archival data. Their interpretation of the reasons for the dramatic shift from jury trials to negotiated justice offers no comfort for contemporary apologists of plea bargaining as more "professional." The combination of new data and critical reflection on accepted theories make this essential reading for anyone interested in criminal justice policy." Rick Abel, Connell Professor of Law, UCLA Law School "A fascinating account which traces the origins of plea-bargaining in the politicisation of criminal justice, linking developments in day-to-day practices of the criminal process with macro-changes in political economy, notably the structures of local governance. This is a classic socio-legal study and should be read by anyone interested in criminology, criminal justice, modern history or social theory". Nicola Lacey, Professor of Criminal Law and Legal Theory, London School of Economics. |
Table des matières
1 | |
15 | |
Crime Detection and Investigation in General Sessions Prosecutions 18001845 | 45 |
Preparation for Trial in the Mercantile Era | 73 |
Litigation Practice at Trial 18001845 Prosecution and Defence | 99 |
Adjudication by Trial 18001845 Judge and Jury | 139 |
Adjudication by Guilty Plea | 153 |
Sentencing in General Sessions | 173 |
Crime Detection and Investigation18501865 | 223 |
Litigation Practice in General Sessions 18501865 | 251 |
Structure of Guilty Pleas 18501865 | 287 |
Aggregate Justice and Social Control | 309 |
Understanding System Information | 327 |
339 | |
351 | |
The MidCentury Political Economy of Justice and Transformation in Method of Case Disposition | 193 |
Autres éditions - Tout afficher
Expressions et termes fréquents
accused appeared arrested assault attempted Attorney became Book called cent century Chapter character charge circumstances citizens City common complainant consider conviction counsel court crime criminal cross-examination defendant direct disposition District Attorney’s Files earlier evidence examination example fact Figure given grand larceny guilty pleas Illustration included increased indictment individual involved issues James John judges jurors jury lawyers lesser magistrate March Mayor method Minute months nominative reports notes occurred offence period person plea bargaining Police Office political possession practice present prisoner proof prosecution prosecutor punishment question reason record reports respectable response Rogers role rules sample sentence Sessions Smith Special Justice statements statute stolen Street Table taken testimony Thirty tion told took trial verdict watch Whilst witnesses York