Avis des internautes - Rédiger un commentaire
Aucun commentaire n'a été trouvé aux emplacements habituels.
Autres éditions - Tout afficher
Reflections on the trial of the prince de Polignac and his colleagues ...
sir William Shee
Affichage du livre entier - 1836
Reflections on the Trial of the Prince de Polignac and His Colleagues ...
Aucun aperçu disponible - 2016
accused addressed appeared arms authority called cause Chamber of Deputies Chamber of Peers character charge Charles Charter civil civil death colleagues Committee Commons condemnation conduct considered constitutional constructive course Court crime crime of treason criminal Crown death determined doubt Duke duty enacted England English established evidence examination existence express fact follows force France French give given honour hope House impeachment importance influence judges judgment July justice King kingdom least letter liberty Lord Louis XVIII managers Marshal matter means ment Ministers Monsieur nature necessary never object observed opinion Paris party passed Penal Code Persil persons Peyronnet political Prince de Polignac principle Procès des Ministres produced prosecution proved punishment question Ragusa received Report respect responsibility Strafford taken thought tion treason trial United witnesses
Page 138 - Tout concert de mesures contraires aux lois, pratiqué, soit par la réunion d'individus ou de corps dépositaires de quelque partie de l'autorité publique, soit par députation ou correspondance entre eux, sera .puni d'un emprisonnement de deux mois au moins et de six mois au plus, contre chaque coupable, qui pourra de plus être condamné à l'interdiction des droits civiques, et de tout emploi public, pendant dix ans au plus.
Page 33 - The job customarily requires full-time training for a period of not less than six months and not more than two years.
Page 140 - However flagitious may be the crime of conspiring to subvert by force the government of our country, such conspiracy is not treason. To conspire to levy war, and actually to levy war, are distinct offences. The first must be brought into open action by the assemblage of men for a purpose treasonable in itself, or the fact of levying war cannot have been committed.
Page 141 - No person shall be convicted of treason except on the testimony of two witnesses to the same overt act, or a confession in open court.
Page 141 - It is not the intention of the court to say that no individual can be guilty of this crime who has not appeared in arms against his country. On the contrary, if war be actually levied, that is, if a body of men be actually assembled for the purpose of effecting by force a treasonable purpose, all those who perform any part, however minute or however remote from the scene of action, and who are actually leagued in the general conspiracy, are to be considered as traitors.
Page 53 - Mary to abrogate and repeal all, but only such as are specified and expressed in this statute of Edward the Third. By which law the safety of both the King and of the subject, and the preservation of the common weal, were wisely and sufficiently provided for, and in such certainty, that nihil relictum est arbitrio judicis.
Page 52 - Third, how dangerous it is by construction, and ANALOGY, to make treasons where the LETTER of the law has not done it. For such a method admits of no limits, or bounds, but runs as far and as wide as the wit and invention of accusers, and the detestation of persons accused, will carry men.
Page 139 - States ought to be enabled to punish it; but as newfangled and artificial treasons have been the great engines by which violent factions, the natural offspring of free governments, have usually wreaked their alternate malignity on each other, the convention have, with great judgment, opposed a barrier to this peculiar danger, by inserting a constitutional definition of the crime, fixing the proof necessary for...