 | Edward Hungerford Goddard - 1862 - 394 pages
...between London and Marlborough, and the goodscarried with him ; upon which I being of counsel with the Defendant, urged that this action lay not, for that a common coachman is but a nets invention, and not within the common law or custom concerning common carriers. — That this is... | |
 | Frederick Green - 1910 - 650 pages
...the goods carried with her. Upon which I, being of counsel with the defendant, urged, that the act1on lay not, for that a common coachman is but a new invention and not within the common law or custom of England concerning common carriers; that this is not for conveyance of goods, but of persons... | |
 | Frederick Green - 1927 - 896 pages
...and the goods carried with her. Upon which I, being of counsel with the defendant, urged, that the action lay not, for that a common coachman is but a new invention and not within the common law or custom of England concerning common carriers; that this is not for conveyance of goods, but of persons;... | |
 | Edward Hungerford Goddard - 1862 - 412 pages
...between London and Marlborough, and the goods carried with him ; upon which I being of counsel with the Defendant, urged that this action lay not, for that a common coachman it but a new invention, and not within the common law or custom concerning common carriers. — That... | |
 | James Oldham - 2004 - 454 pages
...carried whether or not they belonged to a passenger. This was done despite the defense attorney's protest that "a common coachman is but a new invention, and not within the common law or custom of England concerning common carriers."11 In Gishonru v. Hurst, Chief Justice Holt held that... | |
| |
I, being of counsel with the defendant, urged, that the action lay not, for that a common coachman is but a new invention and not within the common law or custom of England concerning common carriers; that this is not for conveyance of goods, but of persons;... 