Parables as Subversive Speech: Jesus as Pedagogue of the OppressedWestminster John Knox Press, 1 janv. 1994 - 299 pages William Herzog shows that the focus of the parables was not on a vision of the glory of the reign of God but on the gory details of the way oppression served the interests of the ruling class. The parables were a form of social analysis, as well as a form of theological reflection. Herzog scrutinizes their canonical form to show the distinction between its purpose for Jesus and for evangelists. To do this, he uses the tools of historical criticism, including form criticism and redaction criticism. |
Table des matières
Part 2 | 73 |
What If the Messiah Came and Nothing Changed? | 131 |
Introduction to Part 3 | 171 |
Justice at the Gate? | 215 |
Concluding Remarks | 258 |
List of Abbreviations | 267 |
Selected Bibliography | 273 |
291 | |
Autres éditions - Tout afficher
Expressions et termes fréquents
Abraham agrarian societies argued aristocratic empires Bailey Bultmann bureaucrats C. H. Dodd Cadbury Cadoux chapter client codification context contracts court Crossan day laborers debt code debtors denarius depicted Derrett Dodd economic estates exploitation figure form criticism Freire Freire's Galilee God's hearers historical Jesus honor hospitality household identified interpreters Jeremias Jewish Joachim Jeremias John Dominic Crossan Judaea judge judgment king land landowner Lazarus Lenski lives Lukan Luke Malina Manson master Matt Matthean Matthew meaning merchants Mishnah moral narrative Oesterley 1936 oppression oral torah owner Palestine parable of Jesus parable's Paulo Freire peasants pedagogy Pharisee political posed prayer problem prophetic prosbul read the parable reconstruction redaction criticism reign retainers role Roman ruler ruling class scene Schweitzer Scott setting steward story subsistence Temple tenants theme theological tion toll collector Torah tradition Trans tribute unclean village vineyard wealth widow Yahweh