...Individual among the Peoples '• For even the Supreme Power [the Legifla" 4ure] cannot [lawfully or juftly] take from " any Man any Part of his Property without " his own Confent." This is Mr. LOCKE'S own Declaration. And Mr. MOLINEUX corroborates it by another ftill ftronger, viz....

...fpoke with entluifiaftic, but perhaps exaggerated admiration of Locke's principle, that the fnpreine power cannot take from any man any part of his property without his own confent, and refufed his afl'cnt to any bill for taxing the American colonies, while they remained unrepresented....

...proprietor." He fpoke with enthufiaftic, but perhaps exaggerated admiration, of Locke's principle, that the fupreme power cannot take from any man any part of his property without his own confent ; and refufed his aflent to any bill for taxing the American colonies, while they remained unreprefented....

...always nicely correct in his expression. For one instance, he says, in one place, that ' the supreme power cannot take from any man any part of his property without his consent, because the end of government is to secure property.' Yet would not any man be justly laughed...

...much in favor of my sentiments, I beg your lordship's leave to read a little of his book. "The supreme power cannot take from any man, any part of his property without his own consent;" and It. II. p. 136—139, particularly 140. Such are the words of this great man, and which...

...deprived unjustly of their property, a.nd by force without right; for "the supreme power," says Locke, "cannot take from any man any part of his property without his own consent. For the preservation of property being the end of government, and that for which men enter...

...and private property — it is a fundamental principle of the British constitution, that the supreme power cannot take from any man, any part of his property without his consent, in person or by representation, that is, taxes are not to be laid on the * people but by their...

...that herein consists the security of property is clearly proved bv LOCKE, who says, " The " supreme power cannot take from any " man any part of his property without " his own consent." Men, he shows, must be in this condition of true freedom, or " they have no property at all...

...Edit. 1772. Another part of his doctrine, of which more use has been made is, that even the supreme power cannot take from any man any part of his property without his own consent, (sec. 138); but this is explained to mean, that all men may be called upon to pay their proportion...

...terms of force to maintain it, whether invaded by a single man, or many in combination. "The supreme power cannot take from any man any part of his property without his own consent. For the preservation of property being the end of government, and that for which men enter...