 Nay, whoever hath an absolute Authority to interpret any written, or spoken Laws; it is He, who is truly the Law-giver, to all Intents and Purposes; and not the Person who first wrote, or spoke them.  Historical Register - Page 3021718Affichage du livre entier - À propos de ce livre
 | 1914 - 790 pages
...that Bishop Hoadley wrote : " Whoever hath an absolute authority to interpret any written or spoken laws, it is he who is truly the law-giver, to all intents and purposes, and not the person who first wrote or spoke them." It must be recognized, however, that this... | |
 | Harold Joseph Laski - 1920 - 332 pages
...king as Christ himself. Nay, whosoever hath an absolute authority to interpret any written or spoken laws, it is he who is truly the lawgiver to all intents and purposes, and not the person who first wrote and spoke them." The meaning is clear enough. What Hoadly... | |
 | Westel Woodbury Willoughby - 1924 - 530 pages
...the Kings and the peers, with the electoral body of the commons." 22 Here, as any written or spoken laws, it is He who is truly the law-giver, to all intents and purposes, and not the person who first wrote and spoke them." "The Province of Jurisprudence Determined,... | |
 | Walter Fairleigh Dodd - 1928 - 774 pages
...Bishop Hoadly's statement that, "whoever hath an absolute authority to interpret any written or spoken laws, it is he who is truly the law-giver to all intents and purposes, and not the person who first wrote or spoke them."4* Upon the basis of the grouping just... | |
 | Frank Johnston - 1925 - 376 pages
...Hoadly as follows: "Nay, whoever hath an absolute authority to interpret any written or spoken Law, it is He who is truly the Law-Giver to all intents and purposes, and not the person who first wrote and spoke them." (Section 276, p. 120.) This utterance... | |
 | Felix Frankfurter - 1927 - 68 pages
...Gray is peculiarly pertinent: "Whoever hath an absolute authority to interpret any written or spoken laws, it is he who is truly the law-giver to all intents and purposes, and not the person who first wrote or spoke them." 8 The scope for interpretation of the... | |
 | 1928 - 1154 pages
...Gray is peculiarly pertinent: "Whoever hath an absolute authority to interpret any written or spoken laws, it is he who is truly the law-giver to all intents and purposes, and not the person who first wrote or spoke them." 8 The scope for interpretation of the... | |
 | 1912 - 1260 pages
...Justice Holmes among others : '• Whoever hath an absolute authority to interpret any written or spoken laws, it is he who is truly the lawgiver to all intents and purposes, and not the person who first wrote or spoke it." In some most vital respects the judges have... | |
 | 1924 - 368 pages
...Senate Legislative Drafting Service "Whoever hath an absolute authority to interpret any written law, it is he who is truly the lawgiver to all intents and purposes, and not the person who first wrote or spoke them." I. THE federal constitution has nothing... | |
 | 1923 - 894 pages
...Bishop Hoadly, as follows: "Whoever hath an absolute authority to interpret any written or spoken law, it is he who is truly the law-giver to all intents and purposes, and not the person who first wrote and spoke them" (section 276). Of course, we all know... | |
| |
